Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
4,483
archived clinical trials in
Influenza

A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cary, NC
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cary, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Dayton, OH
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Dayton, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Grove City, OH
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Grove City, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Gresham, OR
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Gresham, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Austin, TX
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Austin, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Fort Worth, TX
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Fort Worth, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
San Angelo, TX
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
San Angelo, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
San Antonio, TX
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
San Antonio, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Layton, UT
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Layton, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Seqirus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine (Seqirus QIV) With a US-Licensed 2015-2016 Quadrivalent Inactivated Comparator Influenza Vaccine (Comparator QIV) in a Pediatric Population 5 Through 17 Years of Age
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of High-dose Influenza Vaccine Efficacy by Repeated Dosing IN Gammopathy Patients
Study of High-dose Influenza Vaccine Efficacy by Repeated Dosing IN Gammopathy Patients (SHIVERING 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Study of High-dose Influenza Vaccine Efficacy by Repeated Dosing IN Gammopathy Patients
Study of High-dose Influenza Vaccine Efficacy by Repeated Dosing IN Gammopathy Patients (SHIVERING 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Yale University
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Little Rock, AR
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Arkansas Children's Hospital
mi
from
Little Rock, AR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Children's Hospital Colorado
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Colorado Denver
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Bridgeport, CT
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Bridgeport Hospital
mi
from
Bridgeport, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Gainesville, FL
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Florida
mi
from
Gainesville, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rush University Medical Center
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Iowa City, IA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
mi
from
Iowa City, IA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Maryland Medical Center
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Johns Hopkins University
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
NIH Clinical Center
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boston, MA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Worcester, MA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of Massachusetts Med School
mi
from
Worcester, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Michigan
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Rochester, MN
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic Campus Saint Mary's
mi
from
Rochester, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
New York, NY
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
New York University/Bellevue Hospital
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Durham, NC
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Duke University
mi
from
Durham, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of Pennsylvania
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Charlottesville, VA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Virginia Health Center
mi
from
Charlottesville, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
San Diego, CA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Naval Medical Center San Diego NMCSD
mi
from
San Diego, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Northwestern University
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC)
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of North Carolina
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tacoma, WA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC)
mi
from
Tacoma, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Peoria, IL
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
OSF St. Francis Medical Center
mi
from
Peoria, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Cincinnati
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Burlington, VT
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Vermont
mi
from
Burlington, VT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Seattle Children's Hospital
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Royal Oak, MI
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak
mi
from
Royal Oak, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Creighton University Medical Center
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Portsmouth, VA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Naval Medical Center - Portsmouth
mi
from
Portsmouth, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
UCLA Pediatrics Infectious Diseases
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boston, MA
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Boston Children's Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials