Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
8,177
archived clinical trials in
Orthopedic

S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Green Bay Oncology, Limited - Sturgeon Bay
mi
from
Sturgeon Bay, WI
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Green Bay Oncology, Limited - Sturgeon Bay
mi
from
Sturgeon Bay, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia
mi
from
Tlalpan,
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia
mi
from
Tlalpan,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Kapiolani Medical Center at Pali Momi
mi
from
'Aiea, HI
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kapiolani Medical Center at Pali Momi
mi
from
'Aiea, HI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Union Hospital of Cecil County
mi
from
Elkton, MD
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Union Hospital of Cecil County
mi
from
Elkton, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Regions Hospital - Cancer Care Center
mi
from
Saint Paul, MN
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Regions Hospital - Cancer Care Center
mi
from
Saint Paul, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
United States Air Force Medical Center - Wright-Patterson
mi
from
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH
S0702: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Cancer Receiving Zoledronic Acid for Bone Metastases
S0702: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Cohort Study to Assess the Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Starting Zoledronic Acid Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
United States Air Force Medical Center - Wright-Patterson
mi
from
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in Long Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Study Comparing Traditional Open Surgery to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Technique at the Proximal Fusion Levels
Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in Long Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study Comparing Traditional Open Surgery to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Technique at the Proximal Fusion Levels/Levels
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in Long Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Study Comparing Traditional Open Surgery to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Technique at the Proximal Fusion Levels
Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in Long Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study Comparing Traditional Open Surgery to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Technique at the Proximal Fusion Levels/Levels
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hand Function for Tetraplegia
Hand Function for Tetraplegia Using a Wireless Neuroprosthesis
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Hand Function for Tetraplegia
Hand Function for Tetraplegia Using a Wireless Neuroprosthesis
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Zimmer Continuum Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) PostMarket Clinical Followup (PMCF) Study
Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Continuum Metal on Polyethylene Acetabular System
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Denver Health Medical Center
mi
from
Denver, CO
Zimmer Continuum Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) PostMarket Clinical Followup (PMCF) Study
Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Continuum Metal on Polyethylene Acetabular System
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Denver Health Medical Center
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Zimmer Continuum Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) PostMarket Clinical Followup (PMCF) Study
Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Continuum Metal on Polyethylene Acetabular System
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Sah Orthopaedic Associates
mi
from
Fremont, CA
Zimmer Continuum Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) PostMarket Clinical Followup (PMCF) Study
Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Continuum Metal on Polyethylene Acetabular System
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Sah Orthopaedic Associates
mi
from
Fremont, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Tucson Orthopaedic Research Center
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Tucson Orthopaedic Research Center
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Arizona
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Arizona
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
California Pacific Medical Center
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
California Pacific Medical Center
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Illinois Bone & Joint Institute
mi
from
Glenview, IL
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Illinois Bone & Joint Institute
mi
from
Glenview, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Union Memorial Hospital
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Union Memorial Hospital
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mid Michigan Orthopaedic Institute
mi
from
East Lansing, MI
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mid Michigan Orthopaedic Institute
mi
from
East Lansing, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan
mi
from
Grand Rapids, MI
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan
mi
from
Grand Rapids, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Desert Orthopaedic Center
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Desert Orthopaedic Center
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Hospital for Special Surgery
mi
from
New York, NY
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Hospital for Special Surgery
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Univ of Rochester Medical Center
mi
from
Rochester, NY
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of Rochester Medical Center
mi
from
Rochester, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
OrthoCarolina
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
OrthoCarolina
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Health Research Institute
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Health Research Institute
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Rothman Institute
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rothman Institute
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Campbell Clinic / InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center
mi
from
Memphis, TN
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Campbell Clinic / InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center
mi
from
Memphis, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Texas Health Research & Education Institute
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Texas Health Research & Education Institute
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
mi
from
Houston, TX
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Loyola University Medical Center
mi
from
Maywood, IL
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Loyola University Medical Center
mi
from
Maywood, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
mi
from
Newark, NJ
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
mi
from
Newark, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Life Mark Health Centre
mi
from
Calgary,
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Life Mark Health Centre
mi
from
Calgary,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Use of Forteo (Teriparatide) in Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion
Assessment of the Efficacy of Forteo (Teriparatide) in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
UCSF Spine Center
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Use of Forteo (Teriparatide) in Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion
Assessment of the Efficacy of Forteo (Teriparatide) in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
UCSF Spine Center
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution (CIS) in Lung Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients for the Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans
Phase II Trial of Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution (CIS) in Lung Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients for Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution (CIS) in Lung Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients for the Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans
Phase II Trial of Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution (CIS) in Lung Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients for Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Kaiser Permanente
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kaiser Permanente
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
William Beaumont Hospital
mi
from
Royal Oak, MI
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
William Beaumont Hospital
mi
from
Royal Oak, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Pennsylvania Health Systems-PA Foot and Ankle Surgeons
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Pennsylvania Health Systems-PA Foot and Ankle Surgeons
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Center for Foot and Ankle Restoration
mi
from
Dallas, TX
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Center for Foot and Ankle Restoration
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Palo Alto Medical Research Foundation (Sutter Health)
mi
from
Palo Alto, CA
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Palo Alto Medical Research Foundation (Sutter Health)
mi
from
Palo Alto, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Reno Orthopaedic Center
mi
from
Reno, NV
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reno Orthopaedic Center
mi
from
Reno, NV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Kenneth Mroczek, MD-NYU
mi
from
New York, NY
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kenneth Mroczek, MD-NYU
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The CORE Institute
mi
from
Phoenix, AZ
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The CORE Institute
mi
from
Phoenix, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the STAR Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
CT Guided Injection for Low Back Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
A Randomized Trial of CT-guided Perineural Injection With a Corticosteroid Plus a Long Acting Local Anesthetic Versus Standard Medical Management in Patients With Acute Lumbar Radiculopathy and a Corresponding Disc Herniation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Montefiore Medical Center
mi
from
Bronx, NY
CT Guided Injection for Low Back Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
A Randomized Trial of CT-guided Perineural Injection With a Corticosteroid Plus a Long Acting Local Anesthetic Versus Standard Medical Management in Patients With Acute Lumbar Radiculopathy and a Corresponding Disc Herniation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Montefiore Medical Center
mi
from
Bronx, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Selective Depletion of CD45RA+T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
A Multi-center Phase II Study of Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Selective Depletion of CD45RA+T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
A Multi-center Phase II Study of Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Selective Depletion of CD45RA+T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
A Multi-center Phase II Study of Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Yale University School of Medicine/Yale New Haven Hospital
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Selective Depletion of CD45RA+T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
A Multi-center Phase II Study of Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Yale University School of Medicine/Yale New Haven Hospital
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Low Dose Extended-release Epidural and Lumbar Plexus Block Compared to Lumbar Plexus Block for Total Hip Resurfacing
Low Dose Extended-release Epidural Morphine in Conjunction With Lumbar Plexus Block Versus Lumbar Plexus Block Alone for Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
mi
from
Winston-Salem, NC
Low Dose Extended-release Epidural and Lumbar Plexus Block Compared to Lumbar Plexus Block for Total Hip Resurfacing
Low Dose Extended-release Epidural Morphine in Conjunction With Lumbar Plexus Block Versus Lumbar Plexus Block Alone for Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
mi
from
Winston-Salem, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Anabolic and Inflammatory Responses to Short-Term Testosterone Administration in Older Men
Anabolic and Inflammatory Responses to Short-Term Testosterone Administration in Older Men
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
mi
from
Galveston, TX
Anabolic and Inflammatory Responses to Short-Term Testosterone Administration in Older Men
Anabolic and Inflammatory Responses to Short-Term Testosterone Administration in Older Men
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
mi
from
Galveston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Triathlon Total Stabilizer (TS) Outcomes Study
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Triathlon Total Stabilizer (TS) Outcomes Study
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Triathlon Total Stabilizer (TS) Outcomes Study
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Tufts Medical Center
mi
from
Boston, MA
Triathlon Total Stabilizer (TS) Outcomes Study
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Tufts Medical Center
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Triathlon Total Stabilizer (TS) Outcomes Study
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Rothman Institute
mi
from
Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Triathlon Total Stabilizer (TS) Outcomes Study
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rothman Institute
mi
from
Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials