Maxigesic 325 Acute Dental Pain Study



Status:Completed
Conditions:Dental
Therapuetic Areas:Dental / Maxillofacial Surgery
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - 60
Updated:12/8/2018
Start Date:April 2013
End Date:January 2015

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Maxigesic 325 Acute Dental Pain Study: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group Comparison of the Effects of Maxigesic 325 Versus Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen and Placebo in Participants With Acute Dental Pain

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the analgesic effects of Maxigesic USA are
greater than acetaminophen, ibuprofen or placebo.

The combination of 500mg acetaminophen and 150mg ibuprofen has been shown to improve
analgesia compared with the individual components, when given as 2 tablets (i.e. total of
1,000/300 mg) 4 times a day.

Recent concerns over the safety of acetaminophen have led to some regulatory agencies
restricting the maximum dose of acetaminophen per tablet to 325 mg, while maintaining the
maximum daily dose of 4000mg per day.

A dosing regimen of three tablets of Maxigesic 325 four times a day gives a total daily dose
of 3900mg acetaminophen and 1170mg ibuprofen.

The primary objective of the study is to compare time-adjusted SPID of the VAS pain intensity
scores up to 48 hours after the first dose of study medication among the four study groups.

Secondary objectives are:

To compare the time to onset of pain relief after the first dose of study drug defined as (i)
perceptible and (ii) meaningful pain relief among the four study groups using the two
stopwatch method.

To compare the maximum VAS pain scores up to 48 hours after the first dose of study
medication among the four study groups.

To compare the response rates (response rate to be defined as the percentage of participants
who reduce their pain intensity scores by at least 50% compared with the baseline VAS
measure) among the four study groups.

To compare the time to peak reduction in VAS pain intensity scores following the first dose
of study medication among the four study groups.

To compare the time to requirement for rescue medication among the four study groups.

To compare the percentage of participants who use rescue medication among the four study
groups.

To compare the amount of rescue medication used (defined as number of tablets) among the four
study groups.

To compare the categorical global pain rating among the four study groups.

Safety:

To compare adverse event rates for the 48-hour study period and up to Day 30 among the four
treatment groups.

To compare the incidence of known specific NSAID and paracetamol side effects (e.g. GI
ulceration or bleeding, indigestion/stomach pain, post-operative bleeding, bronchospasm, skin
rashes, water retention, renal failure, thromboembolic events and evidence of clinical
hepatitis) during the 48-hour study period and up to Day 30 among the four study groups.

Planned hospital admissions and/or surgical operations for an illness or disease which
existed before the study drug was given or the participant was randomized in the study will
not be considered adverse events.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Provides written informed consent before initiation of any study-related procedures.

- Males and females aged at least 10 years and not more than 60 years old on the day of
consent.

- Undergoing dental surgery for the extraction of at least 2 impacted third molar teeth.

- A resting VAS pain intensity score at baseline (within 6 hours after the completion of
surgery) of greater than or equal to 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS scale with 0 = no pain and
100 = worst pain imaginable.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Has taken any NSAID or acetaminophen within 12 hours prior to the stat of surgery
other than asprin less than or equal to 150 mg/day

- Subjects who have received any anaesthetics within 24 hours prior to surgery

- Hypersensitivity to opioids

- Known to be pregnant or possibly pregnant

- Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to take adequate contraceptive
precautions, i.e., hormonal contraceptive, an intrauterine device, double-barrier
method, or abstinence. A women of childbearing potential is defined as any female who
is less than 2 years post-menopausal or has not undergone a partial or total
hysterectomy or surgical sterilization, e.g. bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral
oophorectomy.

- Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to undergo an urine pregnancy test.

- Suffering from a neurological disorder relating to pain perception or any acute or
chronic condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the subject
unsuitable from an efficacy or safety perspective.

- In the opinion of the investigator, unable to understand the visual analogue pain
score or comply with the protocol requirements.

- Currently, or in the last 30 days, has been in a clinical trial involving another
study drug.

- Currently treated with an ACE inhibitor, warfarin, steroid (other than nasal steroids
or topical steroids with the approval of the investigator) cyclosporin, tacrolimus or
methotrexate, or any other medication felt by the investigator to interfere with
safety or efficacy evaluations.

- Participant weight < 50 kg or > 120 kg.

- Has a history of drug or alcohol abuse.

- Suffering from any other disease or condition which, in the opinion of the
investigator, means that it would not be in the participants best interests to
participant in the study.
We found this trial at
2
sites
Hamilton, Waikato
?
mi
from
Hamilton,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Austin, Texas 78705
?
mi
from
Austin, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials