ADINA vs. High Flow Nasal Cannula Comparison Study



Status:Not yet recruiting
Healthy:No
Age Range:Any
Updated:8/25/2018
Start Date:July 2019
End Date:July 2019
Contact:John R Loor, BS
Email:JLoor@llu.edu
Phone:909-558-5830

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Adaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus (ADINA): Comparison to High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

This study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a pressure limited nasal cannula system
instead of a high flow nasal cannula system in the management of premature babies with
respiratory distress.

NCPAP has been used increasingly to manage respiratory distress in newborns as well as apnea
of prematurity. Humidified high flow nasal cannula devices (flows 1-8 lpm) have also been
used in neonatal intensive care units.

This study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a pressure limited nasal cannula system
instead of a high flow nasal cannula system in the management of premature babies with
respiratory distress.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Neonates admitted to NICU

- Weights of 400-500 grams

- Requiring oxygen greater than 30%

- No evidence of focal lobar consolidation in lung fields

Exclusion Criteria:

- Intolerance to procedure

- gelatinous skin

- known allergy to adhesive material

- interference with therapy

- profound sepsis

- pneumonia

- unmanaged apnea/bradycardia

- known or suspect complex congenital heart disease

- severe cleft lip or palate

- suspect or proven lethal congenital anomaly

- intolerance to the interface used in the devices

- inability to secure an appropriate fit of the patient nasal interface

- considered non-viable or of uncertain viability

- parental refusal.
We found this trial at
1
site
11234 Anderson St
Loma Linda, California 92354
(909) 558-4000
Loma Linda University Medical Center An outgrowth of the original Sanitarium on the hill in...
?
mi
from
Loma Linda, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials