KingVision Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy - Equivalence Trial



Status:Recruiting
Healthy:No
Age Range:Any - 2
Updated:4/21/2016
Start Date:October 2015
End Date:May 2016
Contact:John Hajduk
Email:jhajduk@luriechildrens.org
Phone:312-227-5295

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

A Clinical Evaluation of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope aBlade System in Children

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Ambu KingVision videolaryngoscope
performs as well as direct laryngoscopy for intubating small children and infants.

The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare the Ambu KingVision Video
Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy using the Miller Blade Laryngoscope.

The primary outcome of the study will be time to successful intubation. Other outcomes of
clinical relevance such as first attempt success rates of intubation, grade of laryngeal
view, percentage of glottic opening, number of insertion attempts, hemodynamic responses,
and complications will also be assessed.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients at Lurie Children's Hospital undergoing surgery/procedure where intubation
is indicated

- American Society of Anesthesiology Class I-III patients

Exclusion Criteria:

- Children with an expected difficult airway

- A bleeding or blood clotting disorder
We found this trial at
1
site
225 E Chicago Ave
Chicago, Illinois 60611
(312) 227-4000
Principal Investigator: Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD
Phone: 312-227-5295
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children
?
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials