Individualized Patient Decision Making for Treatment Choices Among Minorities With Lupus



Status:Completed
Conditions:Lupus
Therapuetic Areas:Immunology / Infectious Diseases
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:7/19/2017
Start Date:January 2014
End Date:December 2016

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

The study will compare the efficacy of the usual education materials to individualized
computerized decision guide on decision conflict of patients with lupus nephritis making
treatment decisions regarding immunosuppressive therapies.

The proposed study, a randomized controlled trial [RCT], will evaluate methods to assist
minority lupus patients (African-Americans and Hispanics) to make shared decisions for the
management of their lupus nephritis considering what is the best for them. We have developed
an individualized patient decision guide that is culturally sensitive since it was developed
solely based on the values, beliefs and preferences of minority patients. We will test the
effectiveness of individualized decision aids in African-American and Hispanic lupus
nephritis patients in a 2-arm randomized trial including 200 patients. We hypothesize that
use of decision-aid will be associated with reduction in decisional conflict and more
informed choice compared to usual care group (American College of Rheumatology [ACR] lupus
pamphlet; co-primary effectiveness outcomes), both clinically meaningful and patient-centered
outcomes. We chose the low-literacy decisional conflict scale as our primary outcome, since
it is a validated measure, and the most commonly used outcome measure in decision aids RCTs.
We use informed choice as a co-primary outcome, since this is conceptually most immediate to
the intervention. It will measure whether in those with knowledge of risks and benefits of
immunosuppressive drugs, patient values are concordant with their choice of immunosuppressive
drug. Secondary outcomes include patient involvement in decision-making (concordance on
control preference scale) and patient-physician communication (Interpersonal Processes of
Care (IPC) score and analysis of audiotaped physician-patient Interaction (using the Active
Patient Participation Coding Scheme (APPC)). Since we planned to recruit patients with
current lupus nephritis flare (making current decision for an immunosuppressive drug) and
with past lupus nephritis flares (making the same decision for a future lupus nephritis
flare), two secondary outcomes (control preference scale for concordance of preferred and
real role in deciding about immunosuppressive drugs and the audiotaped physician-patient
interaction about immunosuppressive drugs) will be analyzed only in patients with current
lupus nephritis flare, a subset of the entire cohort.

Inclusion Criteria:

- adult female lupus nephritis patients, currently having a flare of lupus nephritis and
considering change or initiation of an immunosuppressive medication (current flare) or
had had flare of lupus nephritis in the past and at risk for a future lupus nephritis
flare (future flare)

Exclusion Criteria:

- male; lupus but no lupus nephritis; change in lupus immunosuppressive treatment
already made for current flare; end stage renal disease on dialysis; renal transplant
or candidate for a renal transplant
We found this trial at
1
site
1720 2nd Ave S
Birmingham, Alabama 35233
(205) 934-4011 
Principal Investigator: Jasvinder Singh, MD, MPH
Phone: 205-975-0315
University of Alabama at Birmingham The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) traces its roots...
?
mi
from
Birmingham, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials