Comparative Accuracy of Three Versions of Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - Any |
| Updated: | 11/30/-0001 |
| Start Date: | May 2012 |
| Contact: | Ronald D. Miller, MD, MS |
| Email: | millerr@anesthesia.ucsf.edu |
| Phone: | (415) 476-9034 |
Comparative Accuracy of Three Versions of Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring.
There is no study hypothesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the:
1) SpHb (Radical 7 Pulse Co-Oximetry with SpHb™) RevF sensor (currently marketed), 2) the
SpHb RevG sensor (a new, limited release version), and 3) the Pronto-7 sensor (currently
marketed version) in patients undergoing spine surgery.
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the: 1) SpHb RevF sensor (currently
marketed), 2) the SpHb RevG sensor (a new, limited release version), and 3) the Pronto-7
sensor (currently marketed version) in patients undergoing spine surgery. The results from
the three sensors will be compared to a blood hemoglobin level taken intermittently (as a
function of the patient's anesthesia care) and analyzed in the UCSF Clinical Laboratories.
This is an observational study.
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- ASA Classification 1, 2 or 3
- Scheduled to undergo spine surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant of nursing
- In the investigator's judgement would not be suitable for research
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
