Ultrasound Guided Arterial Line Placement in Long Axis Versus Short Axis in Pediatric Patients



Status:Completed
Conditions:Hospital
Therapuetic Areas:Other
Healthy:No
Age Range:Any - 14
Updated:10/14/2018
Start Date:March 17, 2009
End Date:September 25, 2018

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Arterial Line Placement in Long Axis Versus Short Axis in Pediatric Patients.

The use of ultrasound is becoming widespread to guide the placement of arterial lines for
both vascular access and regional anesthesia in the field of anesthesia. Arterial line
placement can be challenging, especially in the pediatric population. Frequently multiple
attempts are required with relatively high failure rates. This can result in excessive needle
punctures and extended OR times. A few studies have looked at the use of ultrasound to
decrease OR time and increase success rates both in adult and pediatric populations. These
studies compared the traditional palpation method with either short axis or long axis views
of the vessel using ultrasound guidance. No study to date has compared short axis and long
axis views for arterial line placement in either the pediatric or adult population. Our study
compares success rates and OR times when long and short axis methods of arterial line
insertion are employed in the pediatric population.

An Arterial line is an intraoperative monitor that is frequently placed in the pediatric
population. Due to their smaller anatomy and more compliant skin, arterial lines can be more
difficult to insert in the pediatric population than in adults. Additionally, lower perfusion
pressure and larger subcutaneous adipose tissue can make pulse palpation more difficult.
Ultrasound is a modality that can directly image the radial, ulnar, or brachial artery. Along
with 2D ultrasound, doppler ultrasound can be utilized to confirm that an artery is not a
vein. Once the vessel is identified, the vessel can be viewed in either the long or short
access. The ultrasound beam is only 1 millimeter thick so a practitioner must stabilize the
probe to view the vessel, especially in the long axis view. Once the artery is viewed in long
axis, the needle can be directly visualized all the way into the vessel. Visualization of a
guidewire or catheter in the vessel can confirm proper arterial access. In a short access
ultrasound view, it is possible to see tissue movement and sometimes a hyperechoic (bright)
dot which represents the needle. Tissue movement can help confirm the needle is immediately
above the artery at all times. The advantage of the short axis view is that less precision is
needed to hold and position the transducer than with the long axis view. The disadvantage of
the short axis view is that the operator cannot see the tip of the angiocatheter as it enters
the vessel. As a result, the proximal portion of the angiocatheter can be above the artery
but the distal tip could be to the side of the artery.

Inclusion Criteria:

- The investigators will identify patients 0 to 14 years of age who are classified as
ASA physical status ≤4 and scheduled to have surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of vasculitis, autoimmune disease, Reynauds phenomenon or disease

- History of no collateral perfusion

- The absence of an upper extremity artery to cannulate such as a bilateral amputee

- A child in DHS custody

- Infection at the site of insertion

- Patient refusal.
We found this trial at
1
site
?
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials